Mainstream Media Bias
If you're new here, you may want to subscribe to my RSS feed. Thanks for visiting!
This episode of Red Hat Blue Hat covers the media obsession over Sarah Palin’s wardrobe, latest polls, Joe Biden’s past health issues, and Obama’s book blurb for Bill Ayers.
Also discussed were the issues of media bias, the flowery language of liberal gaffes, and a woman attacked in NYC for being a McCain supporter.
Show Notes:
- Mainstream Media Bias
- Wag the Blog: Palin’s Shopping Spree
- Study: Coverage of McCain Much More Negative Than That of Obama
- Al Gore Chills at Harvard
- Polls Show Barack Obama Losing Ground
- Inside the Bubble
- CNN Hatchet Job on Sarah Palin
- Erratic Obama Support Physically Attacks McCain Supporter in NYC
- Obama: My idiot VP’s epic gaffe was a “rhetorical flourish”
- Video of John McCain as a Prisoner of War
- Concerns Over Joe Biden and His Brain Aneurysms
- Barack Obama Endorsement of Bill Ayers Book
- Murtha Race Tightens After ‘Racist,’ ‘Redneck’ Remarks
Subscribe to the RedHatBlueHat RSS feed at http://feeds.feedburner.com/redhatbluehat.
Media Donations Favor Democrats 100-1
Investor’s Business Daily documents the extreme liberal bias in the media by examining political donations by media folks.
By analyzing federal records, Investor’s Business Daily reveals a great disparity in the amount of money journalists contributed so far this election cycle to each party.
The contributions add up to $315,533 to Democrats and $22,656 to Republicans — most of that to Ron Paul, who was supported by many liberals as a stalking horse to John McCain, a la Rush Limbaugh’s Operation Chaos with Hillary and Obama.
What is truly remarkable about the list is that, discounting contributions to Paul and Rudy Giuliani, who was a favorite son for many folks in the media, the totals look like this: $315,533 to Democrats, $3,150 to Republicans (four individuals who donated to McCain).
Let me repeat: $315,533 to Democrats, $3,150 to Republicans — a ratio of 100-to-1. No bias there.
And the scribes at the New York Times have recently been forbidden from making political donations.
So the list would have an even greater imbalance if they Times crew were free to flaunt their political proclivities.
