LA Times Suppresses Video of Obama and Radical Islamist Rashid Khalidi

October 26, 2008 · Filed Under Rashid Khalidi, William Ayers 

If you're new here, you may want to subscribe to my RSS feed. Thanks for visiting!

Little Green Footballs is reporting that there is a video in the possession of the LA Times showing Barack Obama at a party for radical Islamist Rashid Khalidi.

But LA Times writer Peter Wallsten is refusing to release the video or reveal his sources.

To the surprise of few, a couple other folks that Obama knows from the neighborhood who also attended the farewell dinner were Bill Ayers and Bernardine Dohrn.

I would be tempted to call this video an October surprise, but that would assume that the mainstream media were willing to pay attention.

Considering the lack of interest by ABC, CBS, NBC, CNN, and MSNBC in Obama’s closet of skeletons, including his ties to ACORN, Father Michael Pfleger, Reverend Jeremiah Wright, Tony Rezko, William Ayers, Jim Johnson, Franklin Raines, etc., I don’t suppose anything Obama has done would be worthy of negative coverage by the MSMs.

Tags: , ,

Comments

Viewing 24 Comments

    • ^
    • v
    Let's see if this is a subject my favorite character would be willing to discuss on the podcast that Shawn has invited us both on.

    The problem is he's starting to get a little wimpy though.

    Still waiting for a reasonable explaination why he wants to conquer everyone here, but he won't attempt to conquer me or anyone else on the podcast.

    I think there's a new name for him. " Wimpy "
    • ^
    • v
    That's old news, that information is up on wikipedia, another non issue.

    That guy is a professor here in the states at Columbia. If he was a threat or did something illegal, he would be in prison.

    "McCain Chief Aided Saddam In Lobbying"

    http://tpzoo.wordpress.com/2008/10/14/mccain-ch...

    That guy got hung.
    • ^
    • v
    Let's discuss that subject on the podcast Thursday!
    • ^
    • v
    I realize you might have been drunk yesterday but I told you like 5 times I'm not doing a podcast. I gave you the reasons why, reread it. Shawn offered you a spot and you turned it down/backed down. Not once here have you actually discussed an issue or offered anything, not once. So I don't expect that to change on a podcast. You can discuss issues here, you don't. Also, I don't think Shawn appreciates you taking all of his blog posts off topic with you constantly asking me out on a date. It's just weird and I think you're bit of a freak. So if you actually ever want to discuss an issue, jump in and we can discuss issues here. If you're just going to follow me around and play follow the leader. That's fine, I just won't respond to those posts but again will respond if you ever decide to actually talk about issues. That's up to you. Your posts don't bother me, I actually think they're funny when you act like a clown. You're not exactly a good representation for your party, not being able to discuss an issue. But that's been kind of typical lately.
    • ^
    • v
    Interesting, all your reasons for not doing the podcast are lame. Same excuses you told Shawn before I asked for the invite. The thing is I don't see why you can't do the same thing on the pod cast that you do here.

    As far as a date, you know what I mean. The podcast, once again there you go with your semantic game again.

    Go back and read the post where I told Shawn I appreciate his having this blog. But that's right, you only do selective reading if it only suits you.

    It's quite apparent you want to hide behind your keyboard but you don't have the balls to do the podcast. Quit insulting everyone's intelligence here with your piss poor excuses.You've already insulted them by saying no one here has the attention span to sit through an hour of the podcast but they can read here. Since when did Shawn let you handle the statistics on how many people listen. Address these points Wimpy.

    It's quite obvious you can talk the talk but you can't walk the walk. That's right, your girfriend won't let you. You mean to tell me she'll have you under her thumb this Thursday at 3:00 Eastern.

    Besides, we've only got 8 more days of togetherness. You know you're going to miss me when this is over.

    I'm going to keep asking because you know everyone is watching you make an ass of yourself here. I want you to point by point come up with better reasons for them to see how all of sudden you're being so wimpy.

    BTW, I was sober yesterday.

    You're just having a hard time accepting "Life is a Two Way Street." You're not used to anyone shoveling the shit back in your face.

    So with that being said.....Are we on for Thursday?

    RSVP
    • ^
    • v
    You were sober when you make like 5 posts in a row, some in all CAPS? So that just means you have no excuses, you're just naturally messed up in the head.

    As far as hiding, I'm right here. I'm discussing issues at an Obama hater site. My first thread with you I asked a simple question if you would vote for Bush/Cheney if they could run for a 3rd term. You didn't answer. A lady came along and answered for you and you thanked her. Why can't you answer any questions for yourself? This blog post is a perfect example. Read the title of it:

    "LA Times Suppresses Video of Obama and Radical Islamist Rashid Khalidi"

    Now take a look at our replies above.

    Me - I actually addressed what Shawn was blogging about.

    You - You didn't touch it. I'm on your mind.

    Do you seriously just don't know about any of these issues or are you one of those typical people I might see at a McCain rally and just don't care about issues?
    • ^
    • v
    I left something out Wimpy,

    "Shawn offered you a spot and you turned it down/backed down."
    Your quote.

    Now why would you say that when you know I accepted his invitation. You know I begged to be on there with you. You really do like to twist things people say don't you.

    So does that mean we're on for Thursday? I'll let you pick the subjects.
    • ^
    • v
    "So does that mean we're on for Thursday?"

    "but I told you like 5 times I'm not doing a podcast."

    Do you have reading comprehension problems? Thats now like 6 or 7 times I've answered with reasons. You haven't shown me an ability to discuss anything, so it would be a waste of my time. The other 3 guys would do all the talking, you would sit there and yell out liberal every 5 minutes.

    Show me you have the ability. Discuss what Shawn just blogged about: -

    LA Times Suppresses Video of Obama and Radical Islamist Rashid Khalidi

    What are your thoughts on that and what do you think of my reply.
    • ^
    • v
    There you go again!

    Lame, Lame, & Lame.

    I really think you must have a social issue about dealing with people live. Why else do you not answer direct questions even from behind your keyboard. You play too many video games in your room as a kid and lose your social skills, but then again, maybe never acquired them to begin with. LIke I said, I'm going to shovel the bullshit back in your face. You were'nt on my mind awhile ago when I took a nice peaceful walk on the beach. You will learn what the word respect is for the next (8) days regardless of who wins this election. I can and will live with the results. Trust me, I know I'm on your mind and you know it but refuse to admit it. You're writing style has drastically changed since you've been accusing me of being drunk. BTW, let's you and I have a beer together if you're going to Affiliate Summit West in January. We can kiss and makeup and be buddies!

    I said, let the moderators ask you and I for our responses to the questions you want to pick. Why did you not answer my question in the last post about you knowing I didn't back out of the invitation. But then again, that is normal for you, twisting words into your own little semactic mind of yours. Even Shawn said he was about to give up on you because he felt like he's talking to a brick wall. Me personally, I've already said I feel like I'm in a pissing match with a skunk. Now you know why I use that analogy, but I can handle the stink you put out for the next (8) days. You see fool, you crossed the line, you have never once shown any respect to anyone here on any post. It's not only what you say, it's how you say it.

    I'll keep asking all the way until Thursday for the podcast. But you're going to hide and come out attacking within the hour after the podcast is over, aren't you?

    You remind me of that paper towel commercial.

    Wimpy, Wimpy, Wimpy

    Get back to the real issue! Why are you insulting the people who read these posts and in the same keystroke insult their intelligence by saying they don't have the attention span to listen to a (1) hour podcast. How rude is that? Answer my question, "Don't Run From It, Anwser the Question." These good folks deserve an honest answer.

    If I apologize for hurting your feelings, will you grow some cajones and join me live so everyone can all see and hear what you and I are made of ? Now twist this statement around anyway you wish, but when you're done justifying the bullshit between your ears on why you won't do the podcast, please come back and anwser this question I just asked. Do I need to give you instructions? I bet it just might set records for them since it's so close to the election, but then again maybe the good folks that read this blog can vote on who's crazy. You or me ? Go ahead an copy and paste this statement now because I just know it's coming.

    You know, Shawn has a pretty decent Alexa rating for this site considering it's only a few months old. Is that the real reason you don't want to go live? That's the same question on the last post you didn't anwser. But no, you precede to tell him you won't do the podcast because only a handful of people listen to it. Once again, anwser my question, where do you have the crystal ball to tell people his podcast is not listened to. Where and why do you get off saying people here do not have the attention span to make it though a podcast.

    Trust me, I will keep asking you simple honest questions about your stupidity.

    Take it to the bank and deposit it, it will spend!

    RSVP
    • ^
    • v
    "LA Times Suppresses Video of Obama and Radical Islamist Rashid Khalidi"

    "What are your thoughts on that and what do you think of my reply."

    Avoided it again.

    Just figured it out. You're not confident in discussing issues with me right here. On a podcast, you would have 3 other Red Hats to help you out, basically do all the talking for you. In the other thread where I asked you the question if you would vote for Bush/Cheney if they could run for a third term, you couldn't answer that one on your own either. Needed that lady to come bail you out and you thanked her for it.

    Like I said, you can call me names all you want, doesn't bother me. Your actions here are defining you as a wimp. I can handle your little names but we can't handle another Republican administration :) .

    "Even Shawn said he was about to give up on you because he felt like he's talking to a brick wall."

    So. I can understand why the missing Blue Hats in the Red Hat/Blue Hat podcast took off now. Even this article, Little Green Footballs. Quite a source there.

    You're not man enough to discuss issues with me one on one, I get that now. You need somebody to hold your hand.
    • ^
    • v
    As far as:

    "Shawn has a pretty decent Alexa rating"

    That tells me you're a noob in this business. Only newbies mention Alexa ratings. Little reality check for you, ready:

    People that listen to the podcast - handful.

    People that read this blog, more than a handful.

    So, discussing issues here on a blog vs. discussing them on a podcast. More people would see it here.

    Do you really think there is a big audience for people wanting to listen to 3 guys from the right talk about Obama for over an hour? Be real.
    • ^
    • v
    There you go again!!!!

    Not answering the questions and attacking because you're insecure and you know you'll get your ass spanked. All (3) moderators are not from the far right.

    But the most important question you did not address which is normal for you, why are you insulting the so called only handful of people who do listen according to your mental stats. Let them decide. Where is your stats to prove only a handful to listen. Step it up BOY, show your stats!

    I think you forgot, I said put on your uniform, we're going to play hardball.

    Attacking me because I mentioned Alexa. There you go dropping your pants again and showing your ass to the world and showing your stupidity behind the keyboard. You obviously have no confidence in your own social skills, that's why you won't do the podcast. It's becoming very apparent for everyone to see. You can only run so far Wimpy.

    If the readers of this blog start posting they want to hear the questions you pick for the moderators to ask you and me on the podcast, are you game?

    Why do you keep running from the questions?

    Let's play some ball Big Boy !
    • ^
    • v
    "Why do you keep running from the questions?"

    Um

    "LA Times Suppresses Video of Obama and Radical Islamist Rashid Khalidi"

    "What are your thoughts on that and what do you think of my reply."

    I just asked you one. Now let's see who runs.

    Now you ask me one and I'll answer. Do that with your next post, ask for my opinion on anything to do with politics, next post. Don't wimp out. Also answer the one I just asked. Don't wimp out, don't run. This is your last chance.
    • ^
    • v
    Let's discuss the issues one on one Live with no moderators if they're willing?

    There you go again, inserting foot in mouth, or is that foot in ass?

    Keep coming up with the lame excuses Wimpy.
    • ^
    • v
    "Let's discuss the issues"

    Ok let's go. Pick an issue and let's discuss. I want it here, so everybody can see. Don't hide in a podcast nobody listens too, where you somebody holding your hand. Step up to the plate, pick an issue, lets discuss. Put up or shut up time.
    • ^
    • v
    Tell you what, do the podcast, the remaining days after I'll engage your hypocritical little ass here everyday till the election. Only after the podcast, because I know you'll wimp out.

    The Best of Both Worlds!!!! Don't You Think? Damn Rick, quit asking stupid questions, this boy does'nt think.

    Give the whole world your lame ass excuse now! What excuse # are you going to pull out of you bag now? Just admit it, you're a teenager hiding in your bedroom and you have no social skills what so ever. The truth is coming out.

    Now that should bring some traffic all around to the podcast since you still will not show the stats to prove you're not talking out of your ass which seems to be normal. Answer the question, where is your proof the podcast gets no traffic other than your lame thinking which falls inline with the mainstream media.

    That's what Willie taught me, you're a legend in your own mind!
    • ^
    • v
    And you failed. That was your last chance.

    Couple of last points:

    "You've already insulted them by saying no one here has the attention span to sit through an hour of the podcast but they can read here."

    Um, you said you didn't listen to the last one or any of them. Thanks for proving my point.

    Also, the comment that you made that you think that you're on always my mind. Let's just take a look at this thread -

    Shawn writes a blog post.

    You respond but you don't actually respond to what he posted, your first sentence was thinking about me.

    I respond, I talk about the issue, didn't mention you.

    So who's on who's mind? You're probably dreaming about me and I base that in part to you asking me out on dates and saying you want my ass. Some type of weird prison fantasy stuff you got going there. And in the coming days I'm going to prove it some more. Shawn will blog, I'll respond to what he actually blogs about and you'll respond first or right after my post, thinking about me some more, avoiding the topic as usual. I just won't pay any attention to you, again unless you actually find your balls that the lady took from you and decide to talk about issues that Shawn blogs about. But based on what we've seen so far, you won't.

    Have a good night.
    • ^
    • v
    Hiding behind your keyboard.

    Why are you insulting the people who read this blog by saying they don't have the attention span to listen to a podcast. Answer the question! This is why I want a piece of your ass live on the podcast. You pick the questions, then let the moderators ask your own questions that you choose if they're willing. Are you willing to but I know the answer. I'm giving you all the MULLIGANS you will need!

    How many times have I asked you that question and you refuse to acknowledge with an answer. Quit running, you have to be pissing these people off. What an insult!
    • ^
    • v
    You've been paying attention.

    You keep coming back for more, you can't help yourself.

    Like I said, I feel like a cat toying with a mouse here. You're just not up to the challenge to do it live and show your social skills so the world can hear.

    You still tapped dance around the issue of proving no one listens to the podcast.

    Sleep tight, see you tomorrow SUNSHINE!
    • ^
    • v
    McCain Funded Work Of Palestinian His Campaign Hopes To Tie To Obama

    "A 1998 tax filing for the McCain-led group shows a $448,873 grant to Khalidi's Center for Palestine Research and Studies for work in the West Bank. (See grant number 5180, "West Bank: CPRS" on page 14 of this PDF.)"

    http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/10/28/mccain...
    • ^
    • v
    Your point?

    An organization McCain chaired helps a Palestinian group to conduct research in the West Bank or Gaza.

    That is not an endorsement of Khalidi - just another liberal Hail Mary.
    • ^
    • v
    haha c'mon now. helps a Palestinian group. You left out the Khalidi's Center part. Nothing like giving half a million to his group. If an Obama led group did that, you would be all over it. At least be consistent.
    • ^
    • v
    Left out what? It was funding for research of his group, not honoring the man himself.
    • ^
    • v
    LA Times say they won't release tape so they can protect their source. When you're protecting a source, does that mean something is on there that may be considered a crime?

    I wonder if "Jonathan aka Paulie the Parrot" is the source?
 

Trackbacks

(Trackback URL)

close Reblog this comment
Powered by Disqus · Learn more
blog comments powered by Disqus

Bad Behavior has blocked 898 access attempts in the last 7 days.